3 ms·
Very well written. I think using 'make' with the -j parameter (# of parallel jobs) is more useful than using gnu 'parallel'. The reason is that if one of the j
by nimrody 7y ago
Very well written.
I think using 'make' with the -j parameter (# of parallel jobs) is more useful than using gnu 'parallel'. The reason is that if one of the job fails for some reason, you just re-run 'make' and only the required jobs are started instead of restarting the entire computation.
- IndustrialJane 7y agoWith --results or --joblog and --resume-failed GNU Parallel can do this, too.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]