2 ms·
The alternative is to not selectively enforce the rules. I didn't even mention anything about censorship.
by malvosenior 7y ago
The alternative is to not selectively enforce the rules. I didn't even mention anything about censorship.
- objectivetruth 7y agoYes, but "selectively enforcing" the rules is a subjective thing, not an objective thing. There will always be some people who say that ANY removal of ANY post is censorship. So by definition there is no objectively "pure enforcement" possibility. And the other end of the spectrum, no enforcement whatsoever makes the site suck for lots of people so that's out of the question. So there's going to be "selective enforcement," as you call it. And if you were in charge of enforcement, I bet you'd think you were being 100% objective, not selective/subjective, but I bet more that somebody would disagree.