> Nope, they're the opposite of realistic because they disagree with reality. Or, your premises are different. From what I see Scotland derives like 90% of its

> Nope, they're the opposite of realistic because they disagree with reality. Or, your premises are different. From what I see Scotland derives like 90% of its power from Wind, which is possible its unique property. Another thing to take into consideration is that California has a larger population than Scotland. But overall I get what you are saying. I still suspect going 100% renewable won't be feasible for most countries.