Other countries have a mixture of ideology and consequences which limit the scope of their jurisdiction. The ideology itself formed mostly from historical cons

Other countries have a mixture of ideology and consequences which limit the scope of their jurisdiction. The ideology itself formed mostly from historical consequences and collaboration with neighbors. The consequences being their relationship with other countries. Specifically related to negative consequences that have an impact. The US ideology has no limit to its scope, and the consequences are non-existent. When other countries disagree with US ideology, their desire to maintain a relationship with the US is greater. This allows the US to so far operate with impunity, with notable exceptions being Russia and China, which do ignore administrative requests from the US for things within their territory. This should give a lot of color and context to why the US has a different meaning of jurisdiction than what people expect. A future US could be subject to unilateral drone strikes and internationally coordinated sanctions, forcing more mutual cooperation and limitations in its enforcement scope.