3 ms·
To be fair, the longer one goes back in time the less data there is and I would hazard a guess that prior to 1600 there is no direct data at all.
by reallydontask 7y ago
To be fair, the longer one goes back in time the less data there is and I would hazard a guess that prior to 1600 there is no direct data at all.
- tomohawk 7y agoWe do have history though Check out the Roman Climatic Optimum, for example.
- reallydontask 7y agoThe point I was trying to make is that history is not direct data and thus not anywhere near as reliable. This is not to say that direct data from 2 centuries back is necessarily reliable but it's a step in the right direction