4 ms·
The problem with this is that they replace the html5 <video> tag with an <object> one that WMP plugin will pick up. It should be not important, but are we sure
by jbk 16y ago
The problem with this is that they replace the html5 <video> tag with an <object> one that WMP plugin will pick up.
It should be not important, but are we sure it does comply correctly to all the <video> options and properties? I don't know why but I think not.
Maybe I should activate my activex plugin that replace IE9 <video> tag into a VLC <object> and see how they take it?
- Locke1689 16y agoI think Mozilla's refusal to allow use of OS installed codecs is worse, though. I can see the justification for not providing support for the H264 codec in-browser but not allowing OS codecs seems like taking ideology over technology too far.