Even as somebody who doesn't so much mind their association with the GOP lately (except their unprincipled take on things the President thinks are unpopular eno

Even as somebody who doesn't so much mind their association with the GOP lately (except their unprincipled take on things the President thinks are unpopular enough to ban), they are incredibly inefficient and disappointing. The Second Amendment Foundation seems to be a lot more productive. > But... one has to wonder if that isn't exactly the point. Is somebody intentionally spreading this stuff and trying to fuel this fire exactly because they want to sow discord among the NRA faithful? I think it's basically certain that there are people trying to corrupt and discredit the NRA from without. The opposition would be downright foolish not to try this. It's like that cute time when Americans thought it was silly to think they were being spied on by the NSA. Also, there's a reason why suddenly the New Yorker is concerned about NRA members getting their money's worth. ;- ) In their Recommended Stories section is an article where the subtitle leads with “In the mass-shooting era...”, despite a downward trend in the rate of death by mass public violence, including shootings; we are by no means in an era of mass shooting.