4 ms·

Nice vice spam. What's horrifying about a person being nude again or seeing a nude person? I get the novelty but this is not " absolutely terrifying"

• gtf21 7y ago
  While I would agree in principle that there's nothing shameful about nudity, in most societies, this is simply not the case. Having images circulated of oneself in the nude would be shaming, and I imagine that having these images faked makes one feel a loss of control over one's image. The fact that this was only made to effectively "unclothe" women is also disturbing (if unsurprising). Not sure it qualifies as "spam".
  • buboard 7y ago
    > Not sure it qualifies as "spam". the amount of fake nudes in the page. clearly yellow attention grabbing
    • burgerboy 7y ago
      That's not what spam is you fucking idiot
• smacktoward 7y ago
  What’s horrifying is the part where the nude image is created and published without its subject’s knowledge or consent.
• tunesmith 7y ago
  That's not the question - the question is what is horrifying to the person that is unwillingly having their altered picture circulated? It's about the feelings of the person being depicted.
  • buboard 7y ago
    ok but that has been happening for decades
    • tunesmith 7y ago
      Therefore what?
• Quackatron 7y ago
  Consent.
• locopati 7y ago
  I'm guessing you're not someone who would be judged for or suffer consequences of fake images (nude or otherwise) of you being distributed.