3 ms·
> Offset tax-burden incurred by their incarceration. Prisoners should be a tax burden. That way, there's no incentive to conveniently round up more prisoners e
by crooked-v 7y ago
> Offset tax-burden incurred by their incarceration.
Prisoners should be a tax burden. That way, there's no incentive to conveniently round up more prisoners every time the local town needs more free labor.
http://theconversation.com/exploiting-black-labor-after-the-abolition-of-slavery-72482 http://theconversation.com/exploiting-black-labor-after-the-...
> The living conditions of leased convicts are documented in dozens of detailed, firsthand reports spanning decades and covering many states. In 1883, Blackmon writes, Alabama prison inspector Reginald Dawson described leased convicts in one mine being held on trivial charges, in “desperate,” “miserable” conditions, poorly fed, clothed, and “unnecessarily chained and shackled.” He described the “appalling number of deaths” and “appalling numbers of maimed and disabled men” held by various forced-labor entrepreneurs spanning the entire state.
- mieseratte 7y agoWell they still are a tax-burden. It's just offsetting that burden, so your criteria is still satisfied :) > In 1883, I'm not saying the modern penal system isn't without need for reform, but using an example from the 18th Century isn't helping your argument here.