6 ms·

Since you asked, complaining about getting downvoted tends to acquire more downvotes. I would also suggest not simply sharing your opinion and stating it as fa

by cf498 7y ago

Since you asked, complaining about getting downvoted tends to acquire more downvotes. I would also suggest not simply sharing your opinion and stating it as fact, this site lives on productive discourse. You simply posting your opinion doesnt benefit anyone. What answer would you have expected, except people agreeing or disagreeing with you? Your edit sounds rather similar. You might want to take a look into the community guidelines. > Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. It destroys intellectual curiosity, which the site exists for.

stirfrykitty 7y ago
Thank you for your civil reply. Nothing political or ideological in stating that prison labor for the public good is a good thing. It is. That's a fact. Prisoners owe the public for their malfeasance, hence their serving time to pay back society for breaking the social compact. I will say, however, that this site appears and acts disproportionately left in its operation. And while I am a very far right ultra-traditionalist, I can happily exist around others with differing opinions. Notice, if you will, that I never vote anyone down. People are entitled to opinions. The left seems militantly opposed to any viewpoint that challenges their narrative. Voltaire applies...
- papln 7y ago
  You are using the word "fact" where its patently obvious that "opinion" is the correct word, after your mistake was already explained to you. > prison labor for the public good is a good thing. is an opinion. > Prisoners owe the public is an opinion > for their malfeasance, is an opinion > breaking the social compact opinion or debatable fact. > I am a very far right ultra-traditionalist, Yes, slavery is traditionalist. Here are some facts you might find enlightening https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13th_(film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13th_(film)
  - stirfrykitty 7y ago
    Slavery was a democrat policy. Fact. And I'm not a Republican--they are too liberal and too soft. I've always been opposed to slavery. Just because some prisons and policies have been wrong doesn't mean prison labor is wrong. Just because I'm a traditionalist doesn't in the slightest equal support for slavery. I'm a traditionalist in that I'm a strict constructionist as regards the Constitution, natural marriage (man/woman), pro-military/pro-conscription (or equal civil service), low-tax, small government. I'm OK with your thoughts, opinions, and ideas. They don't offend me. I'm not a snowflake, soft, or easily offended. I thrive in challenging environments, but I loathe how others cannot accept my opinion when I accept theirs. I work with all manner of people, and I disagree with most of them, but I never get bent out of shape over the fact that some of them voice things that I find disheartening or abjectly stupid. I just smile and let them go about their merry way.
    - JakeStone 7y ago
      Slavery was a Constitutional policy. Article 1, Section 9 contains: "The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person." It had nothing to do with the Democratic party or the Republican party. If your linking of slavery with the Democratic party is somehow connected to Lincoln being a Republican, so of course the Republicans freed the slaves, then I'd suggest reading about the presidencies of FDR, LBJ, a bit regarding Nicon's "Southern Strategy", and Clinton. The geographic south of the U.S. was conservative Democratic prior to them, and shifted to conservative Republican. The parties changed. The people in place (for the most part) didn't.
    - komali2 7y ago
      > but I loathe how others cannot accept my opinion when I accept theirs. Your belief that gays should not allowed to marry illustrates that you believe some people are Less Than bases on things out of their control (their sexuality, in this case). To hold this opinion is not a problem. To defend it, or espouse it, however, you have no choice but to step forward and say "gays are not as much People as me." That's an attack on someone's humanity, and totally unacceptable, totally untenable. People being upset with you for attacking someone's very worth as a human isn't them being snowflakes, it's them fully rejecting a prejudiced person, and showing them the door.

by cf498 7y ago

stirfrykitty 7y ago

Thank you for your civil reply. Nothing political or ideological in stating that prison labor for the public good is a good thing. It is. That's a fact. Prisoners owe the public for their malfeasance, hence their serving time to pay back society for breaking the social compact. I will say, however, that this site appears and acts disproportionately left in its operation. And while I am a very far right ultra-traditionalist, I can happily exist around others with differing opinions. Notice, if you will, that I never vote anyone down. People are entitled to opinions. The left seems militantly opposed to any viewpoint that challenges their narrative. Voltaire applies...

papln 7y ago
You are using the word "fact" where its patently obvious that "opinion" is the correct word, after your mistake was already explained to you. > prison labor for the public good is a good thing. is an opinion. > Prisoners owe the public is an opinion > for their malfeasance, is an opinion > breaking the social compact opinion or debatable fact. > I am a very far right ultra-traditionalist, Yes, slavery is traditionalist. Here are some facts you might find enlightening https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13th_(film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13th_(film)
- stirfrykitty 7y ago
  Slavery was a democrat policy. Fact. And I'm not a Republican--they are too liberal and too soft. I've always been opposed to slavery. Just because some prisons and policies have been wrong doesn't mean prison labor is wrong. Just because I'm a traditionalist doesn't in the slightest equal support for slavery. I'm a traditionalist in that I'm a strict constructionist as regards the Constitution, natural marriage (man/woman), pro-military/pro-conscription (or equal civil service), low-tax, small government. I'm OK with your thoughts, opinions, and ideas. They don't offend me. I'm not a snowflake, soft, or easily offended. I thrive in challenging environments, but I loathe how others cannot accept my opinion when I accept theirs. I work with all manner of people, and I disagree with most of them, but I never get bent out of shape over the fact that some of them voice things that I find disheartening or abjectly stupid. I just smile and let them go about their merry way.
  - JakeStone 7y ago
    Slavery was a Constitutional policy. Article 1, Section 9 contains: "The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person." It had nothing to do with the Democratic party or the Republican party. If your linking of slavery with the Democratic party is somehow connected to Lincoln being a Republican, so of course the Republicans freed the slaves, then I'd suggest reading about the presidencies of FDR, LBJ, a bit regarding Nicon's "Southern Strategy", and Clinton. The geographic south of the U.S. was conservative Democratic prior to them, and shifted to conservative Republican. The parties changed. The people in place (for the most part) didn't.
  - komali2 7y ago
    > but I loathe how others cannot accept my opinion when I accept theirs. Your belief that gays should not allowed to marry illustrates that you believe some people are Less Than bases on things out of their control (their sexuality, in this case). To hold this opinion is not a problem. To defend it, or espouse it, however, you have no choice but to step forward and say "gays are not as much People as me." That's an attack on someone's humanity, and totally unacceptable, totally untenable. People being upset with you for attacking someone's very worth as a human isn't them being snowflakes, it's them fully rejecting a prejudiced person, and showing them the door.