> there are numerous ways that could've oopsed in. that's why i said "dishonesty at the org level". i don't think there's any one particular person in mozilla

> there are numerous ways that could've oopsed in. that's why i said "dishonesty at the org level". i don't think there's any one particular person in mozilla at the prenda law-level of crookedness, but what exactly is their company culture around privacy that they end up casually slipping a surveillance tool into a web page that's ostensibly against surveillance?