3 ms·
You need to read both of these, and you need to understand what they mean in the context of EU law. https://gdpr-info.eu/art-58-gdpr/ https://gdpr-info.eu/art-
by DanBC 7y ago
You need to read both of these, and you need to understand what they mean in the context of EU law.
https://gdpr-info.eu/art-58-gdpr/ https://gdpr-info.eu/art-58-gdpr/
https://gdpr-info.eu/art-83-gdpr/ https://gdpr-info.eu/art-83-gdpr/
You also need to remember that if the regulator has got it wrong there is a remedy available for the person being fined.
About cannabis: generally the first offence will receive a warning unless there are aggravating factors. Police are expected to take an escalating approach: 1st offence = warning, 2nd offence = penalty notice for disorder (which doesn't result in a criminal record if it's paid), 3rd offence = arrest followed by caution or charge and prosecution.
- downandout 7y agoNeither of those links you pointed to say anything about warnings being required, or even customary for that matter.
- DanBC 7y agoBecause you haven't understood the context of what the EU means when it says "proportionate". Article 83 is basically a long list of reasons to avoid giving a fine but to give a warning instead.