4 ms·
i guess if we had a highly regulated and one site for one type of service it would be possible but i would not really want that. you could have a algorithm that
by reshie 7y ago
i guess if we had a highly regulated and one site for one type of service it would be possible but i would not really want that. you could have a algorithm that would parse your query and send you directly to a site of course it could get it wrong where you may need to refine you query just like now sometimes. of course thats still a search engine but more direct. bookmarks are already a form of web without re-searching.
it sounds like what you really want is a decentralized search engine and anonymous by default as apposed to no search engine.
- orky56 7y agoAOL [1] among others in the early days did exactly that. Without using a search engine, you could access whatever type of content you wanted. Similar to a communism vs capitalism argument, you don't quite the same amount of variety but you trade that for instant access to what you need. [1][https://www.trbimg.com/img-5320a78f/turbine/orl-0312aol-19960829 https://www.trbimg.com/img-5320a78f/turbine/orl-0312aol-1996...]