>> Sorry but this is just crazy. The article was about "virtues of Haskell's strong type system" but you seem to have read it as "Why you should use Haskell an

>> Sorry but this is just crazy. The article was about "virtues of Haskell's strong type system" but you seem to have read it as "Why you should use Haskell and Type driven development in place of your existing C++ or Java Stack." The author has published a computer science book. He probably doesn't work in a big company, but lots of people work in big companies and still appreciate FP / type theory / computational theory and forays into those realms. Not to mention... A little bit of stuff like this and a lot of Rust makes more sense.