2 ms·
I may have misunderstood your assertion then. Did you mean the following? Did you mean something like, here exists some delta and t as for every x>y, with y a
by rat9988 7y ago
I may have misunderstood your assertion then. Did you mean the following?
Did you mean something like, here exists some delta and t as for every x>y, with y an element of R, f(x+t) > f(x)+delta
- stkdump 7y agoYou can choose any delta, so that f(t)*constant=f(t+delta) for every t.
- rat9988 7y agoI have misunderstood your original comment. You are indeed correct. Edit: I just noticed that the function which maps x to 0 satisfies this condition as well, but isn't the exponential function if we consider 0 as part of the domain definition. It doesn't matter much for our discussion though.