4 ms·
> Reminder that during the time generally pointed to as 'the good old days' (the 1950s) the top tax bracket was 85% ...but pretty much nobody in those brackets
by gridlockd 7y ago
> Reminder that during the time generally pointed to as 'the good old days' (the 1950s) the top tax bracket was 85%
...but pretty much nobody in those brackets actually paid those rates:
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-29/hollywood-stars-didn-t-pay-90-percent-tax-they-created-loopholes https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-29/hollyw...
(edit)
To the people who don't get the point:
Taxes never were that high in reality, so we can't draw any conclusions on what such a high tax would actually do.
People may have this fantasy about rich people that they're just hoarding money like a dragon hoards gold. In reality, rich people invest their money, which the government wants them to do, so they don't tax investments (capital gains) that highly.
- supergauntlet 7y agoIs your argument that because people can evade taxes that we shouldn't collect taxes?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- oceliker 7y agoThe argument is that the 85% tax bracket was never really 85%, so it doesn't set a valid precedent.
- NeedMoreTea 7y agoWhich is surely an argument to be careful to avoid evasion loopholes?