2 ms·
> Mere assertion that their perspectives are relevant Is it your reading comprehension that's lacking, or just your integrity? I said perspective is relevant.
by notacoward 7y ago
> Mere assertion that their perspectives are relevant
Is it your reading comprehension that's lacking, or just your integrity? I said perspective is relevant. I didn't say their perspective.
- kragen 7y agoWhat would it even mean for perspective per se to be relevant or not? We aren't discussing art history! I did indeed read your comment as saying that the perspectives of the hypothetical conclusion-jumpers were relevant, which would at least have been coherent. I can't make heads or tails of your comment about perspective being relevant — you apparently meant to accuse me of some kind of dishonesty, but it isn't even clear what I'm being accused of. In any case, your comments so far provide very little reason to take seriously anything you say.
- notacoward 7y ago"Perspective is relevant" means that it's important to have some. This is a cool scientific advance. I said so before you even showed up. But it's not something that's immediately useful to most readers. That's perspective: like this from one POV, like that from another. Is that clear enough for you?