> They could've also used AGPL for that. A popular option. That's not even close in intent. Under A/GPL terms anyone can take a project as is, slap a logo on

> They could've also used AGPL for that. A popular option. That's not even close in intent. Under A/GPL terms anyone can take a project as is, slap a logo on it, make a binary and start selling it, provided that they make sources available. That's exactly the case that the Commons Clause prohibits, so AGPL does an absolute zilch here.