3 ms·
Unfortunately unlikely. This exact scenario has happened before, except on a prominent photography publication instead of Medium: https://news.ycombinator.com/i
by jakelazaroff 7y ago
Unfortunately unlikely. This exact scenario has happened before, except on a prominent photography publication instead of Medium: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18332918 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18332918
- Nrsolis 7y agoIt's going to keep happening until someone takes them to court. I hate to say it but unless you're bound by an arbitration agreement in the terms of service you should just file in small claims. Even still...file in small claims and make them fight to have the case sent to arbitration. Lawyers are expensive and you won't need one in small claims. Sometimes the process is the punishment.
- rhino369 7y agoArbitration clauses are pretty good for consumers for small injustices. KitSplit can't litigate an arbitration for even $35,000 dollars, let alone $3,500.
- ddalex 7y ago> We also provided Peter reimbursement for the camera, and are seeking additional reimbursement via collections. So it died at that point because they reimbursed the owner. This is their only way out at this point. But they took the high ground this time, and it's likely that the bad press will grow until they will compensate the unlucky chap to make this disappear as well.