3 ms·
The backend of this isn't any better. They've been outsourcing significant amounts of this to secondary companies (e.g. Easter Seals, BHPN), which then outsour
by shaftway 7y ago
The backend of this isn't any better.
They've been outsourcing significant amounts of this to secondary companies (e.g. Easter Seals, BHPN), which then outsource the work to smaller agencies. This turns into the smaller agencies fighting for basic services on behalf of clients.
There are regular mandatory meetings (monthly I think) where execs from Kaiser and the intermediaries announce breaking changes, or straight out berate the group of providers for doing their job, or for not doing things that aren't their job. They like to change coding rules without telling people and then blaming them for not coding properly. They also like to force companies to follow rules, especially when it doesn't particularly make sense (like carrying insurance for injuries to customers when customers aren't allowed on-site).
Then after all of that they'll arbitrarily hold payment as long as the possibly can. A couple of the smaller agencies in our area have gone under because they couldn't pay staff while they waited for checks. We've seen them delay payment by over a year after services were billed.
The only real strategy in this case is to spread out your customers by insurance provider. Unfortunately that means turning very needful customers away, because you can't become too reliant on any one funding source.
Source: I provide support to a mental health services agency in my off time.