3 ms·
I worked on one of those systems. For some screening tasks, it has been at or beating average-radiologist performance since the mid or late 90s. There are a n
by ska 7y ago
I worked on one of those systems. For some screening tasks, it has been at or beating average-radiologist performance since the mid or late 90s.
There are a number of issues, but it's true that raw algorithmic performance is a small part of the whole picture.
- RosanaAnaDana 7y agoThis is often the case in almost all ml-augmented workflows. The augmentation begins and ends with people looking at things, because the machine only knows what you told it, and doesn't care. The real work is building systems around people who do the interpretation and labeling to make their jobs easier.
- ska 7y agoYes, very much this. And the importance of workflow impact cannot be overstated. The (clinical) system I mention above, the ML part was a few percent of the total effort, max.
- agumonkey 7y agocan you tell us more about the rest ?