3 ms·
> Is Revolut offering lower but less sustainable costs to attract more customers? Revolut broke even on monthly bases in December 2017[1], and Monzo was still
by krn 7y ago
> Is Revolut offering lower but less sustainable costs to attract more customers?
Revolut broke even on monthly bases in December 2017[1], and Monzo was still loosing money in April 2019[2].
[1] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-fintech-revolut/fintech-revolut-britains-first-digital-bank-to-break-even-idUSKCN1GA021 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-fintech-revolut/fintech-r...
[2] https://metro.co.uk/2019/04/08/monzo-set-100m-funding-despite-not-turning-profit-9132030/ https://metro.co.uk/2019/04/08/monzo-set-100m-funding-despit...
- TazeTSchnitzel 7y agoInteresting. Maybe Revolut's paid accounts work out well for it or it's able to earn profit from certain services.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- easytiger 7y agoThis is the second post that you've made that isn't true. Revolut is not profitable. It reports an operating loss. What's your reason for such inaccurate information?
- krn 7y ago> Revolut is not profitable. It reports an operating loss. It reported an operating loss for 2017, because it stopped losing money on monthly basis only in December 2017.
- easytiger 7y ago> It reported operating loss for 2017, because it stopped losing money on monthly basis only in December 2017. What are you talking about? That's gibberish. It lost about £15million in 2017
- krn 7y ago> It lost about £15million in 2017 If a company was losing money for the first 11 months out of 12, that's an expected result.
- easytiger 7y ago> If a company was losing money for the first 11 months out of 12, that's an expected result. I dunno what you think you are trying to achieve. Revolut is not profitable
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]