I have recently seen a hard uptick of social "science" papers with a N=1, where said N is the author describing their personal experience, i.e. biased and highl

I have recently seen a hard uptick of social "science" papers with a N=1, where said N is the author describing their personal experience, i.e. biased and highly subjective anecdotes. Mind you, otherwise these papers look very "sciency", with tons of citations and footnotes sprinkled in, and quite often with grant disclosures at the end. At least, this is my N=1 experience ;)