3 ms·
You should go back and read what I wrote: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20262316 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20262316 I didn't fan flames. Ther
by jgrahamc 7y ago
You should go back and read what I wrote: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20262316 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20262316
I didn't fan flames. There was already a link to our status page on the front page of HN. While the event was happening I gave short updates by editing a comment here.
Also, your "affected less than 10% of their traffic during early hours of the morning" is incredibly parochial and seems to ignore the fact that people use the Internet world over.
- txcwpalpha 7y ago>While the event was happening I gave short updates by editing a comment here. It is disingenuous to only state you edited "a comment" there. You posted 10 comments in that thread, with at least another 10 edits. Of the top 5 comments, three of them are yours. On HN, each time you make a comment and people upvote your comment, it contributes to ranking the post higher on HN's front page. I fully understand that you were probably just trying to be communicative, but unintentionally or not, you did "fan the flames" by drawing additional attention to the issue.
- jgrahamc 7y agoSo, you'd propose I sit back and leave a story with incomplete information on HN's front page and say nothing? True that I posted other comments but they are short and don't say much. The real action was the main top comment.
- txcwpalpha 7y agoAbsolutely not! I appreciate your communication during the incident, and I definitely don't mean to discourage any participation in threads or reduce communication. I'm just pointing out that it did, if unintentionally, draw more attention to the issue. What I don't appreciate is your company's unprofessional response re: Verizon after the issue ended, but that's been discussed elsewhere.