Sorry, "are a similar situation" makes no sense at all and I have no idea why I said that. I think I meant to say something more like "I have a theory that our

Sorry, "are a similar situation" makes no sense at all and I have no idea why I said that. I think I meant to say something more like "I have a theory that our mass shooting epidemic originates from a shift in the general mental health of our population which causes some members of that pop. to want to go kill a bunch of people just to kill a bunch of people" To respond to your comment, I'm talking about methods to go kill a bunch of people. One of those is using guns, and it seems to be the favored method in the US at the moment. However, it is not the only way, the Paris attack (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Nice_truck_attack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Nice_truck_attack), was more deadly than any mass shooting I'm aware of in the US and used a lorry. Nearly everyone over 16 in the US has access to a tremendously deadly weapon in the form of their car. I'd argue it's easier to go run over a ton of people with your car than go buy a gun to shoot them up. My theory is that it is fashionable with the psychos of the moment to use a gun. If you take the guns away, what happens? Do they go to cars/trucks, do we have a return to fertilizer pickup bombings? I'm not sure, and that's what worries me about gun control measures -- no attempt to address root cause. Humans have been coming up with ways to kill each other forever. We legislate away one -- cool. What about the other ways? Haven't addressed the problem of people wanting to go kill a bunch of other humans for seemingly no reason at all beyond fame/notoriety (what seems to be many of the shooters' motives).