>It's not a comparison of pre-GI bill veterans to post-GI bill veterans that you are actually making. That's precisely the comparison. You can't remove somethi

>It's not a comparison of pre-GI bill veterans to post-GI bill veterans that you are actually making. That's precisely the comparison. You can't remove something from the argument space simply because it was a worse situation, that's a textbook logical fallacy. The thing being compared here has nothing to do with the sacrifices of soldiers, and everything to do with a specific proposal: a group of people being asked to contribute to the greater good via a benefit they were not able to have. By the way, reducing this to "millenial english literature majors whining about being unemployable" simply makes people stop listening to you, because you clearly haven't been listening to them. Insulting, belittling, and making assumptions will always harm your point.