4 ms·

.photo and .photos sounds like a domain spoofer’s dream.

• icebraining 7y ago
  Not much different than .com and .co, which already existed before the new TLDs.
  • oarsinsync 7y ago
    The major difference is that ICANN got paid a large sum for both .photo and .photos, while .com is a legacy gTLD and .co is a ccTLD.
    • logfromblammo 7y ago
      I would have added .img, .res, .txt, .src, .var, .dev, .etc, .bin, .lib, .bak, .dir, .key, and (of course) .log, as gTLDs without charging for them. But I guess that's why I don't work for ICANN.
      • deleted 7y ago
        [deleted]