and that's not really the same thing. That couple could buy a cake anywhere else if they wanted. The thing is with social networking websites, there's nothing

and that's not really the same thing. That couple could buy a cake anywhere else if they wanted. The thing is with social networking websites, there's nothing mandating that the company must allow content on their network that they personally find abhorrent. Imagine if, pedophiles complained about their freedom of speech to sexualize children in a textual sense. In some countries that would be illegal because it would be child pornography, in others would it be freedom of speech? Would the company be not allowed to remove it? No. The consistent message social networking/services say is that it's not within the well being of the community to allow "fake and harmful content", in the previous example they would say that it is "harmful".