3 ms·
I don't think there's a need for an amp cache with amp4email. The privacy concerns that make an amp cache necessary don't apply in the same way, only the securi
by joshuamorton 7y ago
I don't think there's a need for an amp cache with amp4email. The privacy concerns that make an amp cache necessary don't apply in the same way, only the security concerns that require a safe html subset. So an imap client could cache the amp js locally, and render dynamic content by querying the sender directly.
I could be wrong though, but I believe that works.
- ocdtrekkie 7y agoDoesn't it reintroduce the issues with senders detecting if their emails were read and where from by tracking requests? I thought Gmail started caching images from emails and hosting them to prevent that.