Funny how all the commenters from previous posts on this topic insisted it was a misidentified birds, even though none of the data points truly fit that dismiss

Funny how all the commenters from previous posts on this topic insisted it was a misidentified birds, even though none of the data points truly fit that dismissal and you have to resort to witness bashing these pilots to make it work. “It cannot be therefore it must not be” is not valid reasoning and never will be.