3 ms·
In the US the distinction is drawn on "imminent lawless action." People are free to say or 'incite' whatever they want, unless its likely to lead to "imminent l
by rjf72 7y ago
In the US the distinction is drawn on "imminent lawless action." People are free to say or 'incite' whatever they want, unless its likely to lead to "imminent lawless action." And in the precedent on record, imminent is a standard that is not taken lightly.
- "This building should be [unlawfully] burnt down." = legal
- "I've got gas and matches. Let's meet up today and [unlawfully] burn this building down. Who's with me?" = illegal