3 ms·
Sure, that all makes sense, but why could it not do the initialization once (when something changes like you describe), save it, and reuse it next time? EDIT:
by adsche 7y ago
Sure, that all makes sense, but why could it not do the initialization once (when something changes like you describe), save it, and reuse it next time?
EDIT: Ah, sorry, you're saying the enumeration/scanning for changes is what takes most of the time?