>Another potential problem is producing fake confessions in e.g. criminal cases. The person who allegedly confesses would not sign the recordings, and the polic

>Another potential problem is producing fake confessions in e.g. criminal cases. The person who allegedly confesses would not sign the recordings, and the police's signatures are worthless if they are fabricated. To look at it from the dystopian, draconian point-of-view, deep-fakes created and used by the local justice system[s] could be signed by a police officer (who's intent is "solving the case, no matter what"). No matter how many witnesses and experts that you throw at it, the court will almost always believe the officer (because of unjustly doted infallibility) and that deep-fake could cost someone their life. Just as other tools have been used for good and bad, on both sides of law enforcement, the probability lends to this equally be abused; especially, in areas where "south of the Mason-Dixon line" and "the south will rise again" are still parts of every-day parlance.