4 ms·
It is widely acknowledged in war-fighting circles that America's aircraft careers are only useful in policing actions - i.e. to be used as a threat of war, and
by fit2rule 7y ago
It is widely acknowledged in war-fighting circles that America's aircraft careers are only useful in policing actions - i.e. to be used as a threat of war, and not actually of any use in conditions of total war, since they are big, fat, slow moving high-value targets that can easily be taken out with widely deployed missiles designed for the job - i.e. the P-270 MOSKIT (SS-N-22 Sunburn) missiles, which Russia developed specifically to counter the threat.
Americans don't like to be told this, nor will they work to understand it beyond a glib "America, Fuck yeah!" style response, but the American naval surface fleet is probably one of the first casualties in an all-out war. The MOSKIT is deployed specifically to target these carriers, and there is - so far - no defence against them. Laser-based defences are being developed to defend against the threat, but are not widely deployed across the fleet.
America will lose its carriers in the first minutes of all-out war.
http://exiledonline.com/the-war-nerd-this-is-how-the-carriers-will-die/ http://exiledonline.com/the-war-nerd-this-is-how-the-carrier...
- wbl 7y agoThe RAM and CWIS systems are designed to deal with the threat. Also you assume the launch platforms can't be targeted. They can be.
- fit2rule 7y agoOf course, all platforms can be targeted, that is the point of open warfare. >RAM and CWIS Yeah, jury is still out on the MOSKVIT survivability, but hey .. lets hope we never find out.
- mrguyorama 7y agoHow proven and tested is the phalanx and similar against "real" Carrier killers? Hell, even the iron dome isn't super reliable. Compare the price of one carrier to 100 ship killing missiles.