Nothing you've written here contradicts what I wrote, because it is a matter of degrees, which you completely fail to acknowledge in your view point. A proport

Nothing you've written here contradicts what I wrote, because it is a matter of degrees, which you completely fail to acknowledge in your view point. A proportion of teenagers in some groups in some parts of society texting privately amongst themselves. Nude, consensual photos are arguably 'better' and more natural than typical pornography in any case and almost certainly less extreme and with a natural progression as the participants get older. It is (to me quite blatant) equivocation on your part to say, well A = B, therefore what is the point. The article mentioned that 1 in 3 children under the age of 10 have seen pornography on the internet. Probably most of them will be fine, but its not probably something they particularly would want (as children, or later as adults) to have happened since there is plenty of time to lose one's innocence. Finally, what have we won? This is a completely destructive dismissive attitude, again possibly characteristic of the highly partisan nature of American politics. Introduce the scheme, tune it, see how it goes. In light of the all of the above, it bemuses and somewhat disappoints me that your opinion should be voted up. You can of course disagree, but, in my mind at least, you have to be more nuissanced and acknowledging.