4 ms·
This is a controversial subject. It is important to get information from sources that have rigorous fact-checking and a reputation to defend.
by throwaway619 7y ago
This is a controversial subject. It is important to get information from sources that have rigorous fact-checking and a reputation to defend.
- abricot 7y agoSo, lets err on the side of genocide?
- FartyMcFarter 7y agoHow about the BBC, is that good enough? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-asia-china-45474277/uighur-exile-describes-life-in-china https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-asia-china-45474277/uigh...
- portobello 7y agoI don't see anything about this topic at that link.
- FartyMcFarter 7y agoTap the image to hear the account of a Chinese surgeon who was involved in organ harvesting.
- throwaway619 7y agoBBC is absolutely good enough. They have a legally binding corporate governance structure, a team of editors fact-checking the reporters and sources, annual audits from an external team, and a reputation for honest journalism to defend for continued readership. https://www.bbc.com/news/help-41670342 https://www.bbc.com/news/help-41670342 I recommend getting information from sources like the BBC over sources like the "China Tribunal".