4 ms·
Wolfe was terrific for the brief span of a decade or so. It is no accident that the books for which he is so often acclaimed (The Fifth Head of Cerberus, Peace,
by Mediterraneo10 7y ago
Wolfe was terrific for the brief span of a decade or so. It is no accident that the books for which he is so often acclaimed (The Fifth Head of Cerberus, Peace, BotNS) were all written in the 1970s. At that time he managed to combine intricately plotted, deceitful-narrator plots with excellent prose that was fully the equal of Proust or Nabokov. Beyond those three book-length works, his short stories of this period are also worth reading.
Once the 1980s arrived, Wolfe’s prose suddenly became plain and lackluster. His works continued to mine the same vein of deceitful narrators where the actual plot and events have to be riddled out by attentive readers, but these started to get dull and frustrating. All that was left to his writing was the book-as-puzzle, and literary value or even mere enjoyment went out the window. His editor kept accepting what Wolfe gave him and took it on faith that the work was competent, but even Wolfe fans have wondered if A Land Across, for example, can even be completely figured out.
Not to mention some cringeworthy stylistic choices and concerns of the late books, like putting the speech of characters on a distant planet into 20th-century ethnic stereotypes (The Book of the Short Sun) or old-man rants about modern society (Pirate Freedom). As someone who got into Wolfe through the early books and then voraciously read everything he wrote after that, the gradual disappointment was crushing.
- glangdale 7y agoCan't say I disagree. Wizard Knight through to Borrowed Man all left me pretty cold. Personally "A Land Across" felt comparatively accessible (if random) as compared to "An Evil Guest" (which felt unreadable), Home Fires or Borrowed Man. As an F/SF enthusiast, I'd say "crushing gradual disappointment" is more or less our lot. I think it's very easy to read way more sophistication and significance into people's earlier work based on enjoyment and sheer energy - then they slide into their ickier or more annoying obsessions, or redo their earlier work, or what have you. See also: Iain Banks, J.G. Ballard, Frank Herbert, Jack Vance, Roger Zelazny, Fritz Leiber... whether it's an appetite for gore, bad sex, bad (or just tedious) politics and social commentary, gadget-too-far driven plots - all of my favourite F/SF authors tend to drift over the years.
- Mediterraneo10 7y agoOr Robert Heinlein, Larry Niven, or Poul Anderson...