4 ms·
Thanks for your comment, I see it can help frame the conversation, but I meant to say I'm not versed in the terminology for social sciences. I'm about to finis
by gota 7y ago
Thanks for your comment, I see it can help frame the conversation, but I meant to say I'm not versed in the terminology for social sciences.
I'm about to finish my Doctorate heavily involving formal logic and logic programming, and have read a sufficient bit about the philosophy of science
This is an interesting discussion but I'm unfortunately out of time now. I'd only point that most of science is abductive, rather than inductive, and that the whole concept of refutation will take us to discuss what is scientific _advance_
- your-nanny 7y agobest just think in terms of Bayesian update.
- gota 7y agoIndeed, abduction is a way to base your priors in Bayesian nets!