3 ms·
No, No, No... "Brilliant people" are defined by others by their work, the period when they were born, how they let others know of their work (a form of self-ad
by WheelsAtLarge 7y ago
No, No, No... "Brilliant people" are defined by others by their work, the period when they were born, how they let others know of their work (a form of self-advertisement), hard work and random luck. Lose any of those and the person loses his/her title of "brilliant." Look at Einstein vs Feynman they both did brilliant work but Einstein is considered the smarter man. Einstein made himself a celebrity. He did as much as he could to make sure that people knew about him. Feynman did not. Einstein is considered a more brilliant man but he was not. Einstein was born a the right time in history. Had he been born 100 years earlier he would not have had the accumulated human knowledge to do his work. He was a hard worker. Up to his last days, he worked to advance his work. And ofcourse just random luck which you can't control.
- m463 7y agoHmmm.. interesting to compare the two. I am a big fan of both, but like Feynman better as a nerd. Wasn't Einstein 40 years older than Feynman? He did physics PLUS politics, including the letter to Roosevelt about the bomb. Even at the challenger investigation Feynman mostly stuck to science. I think Einstein's ability to be interdependent made him a little more brilliant in my eyes. (along with the ability to reflect light)