5 ms·
I can't know what is the resolution but neither does anyone else, which is part of the problem. They only show 2 results at 30% (p 0.01) and 25% (p 0.05) which
by sklivvz1971 7y ago
I can't know what is the resolution but neither does anyone else, which is part of the problem. They only show 2 results at 30% (p 0.01) and 25% (p 0.05) which makes me suspect they have a very low resolution. I can't prove it, but I don't need to. They claim results without providing convincing evidence, not me.
- danaris 7y agoThose numbers, by themselves, tell you nothing whatsoever about the resolution of the measures they're using. They tell you solely that for group A, they got a result of 30% with 99% confidence and for group B, they got a result of 25% with 95% confidence. That doesn't mean that they're approaching the limits of their measurable resolution—it most likely means that group B is smaller, or has more variability in it. If group B had a result of 10% with the same confidence, that would also not indicate that their measures have a resolution of 10%—those things literally have nothing to do with each other. You are reading far too much into the very limited data presented—not merely more than you can prove, more than there can be any possible logical support for.