2 ms·
i think we read very different articles. the one i read is pure journalism. news without taking a side. the position of the professors is probably as you descri
by techslave 7y ago
i think we read very different articles. the one i read is pure journalism. news without taking a side. the position of the professors is probably as you describe — feeling butthurt — but it’s not this article’s job to take a position. it isn’t an editorial.
the article is exactly right to present the professors’ opinion as-is.
- harryh 7y agoI disagree. I think it's incumbent on good journalists to put the views of the people they interview in the proper context. If the subject of an article says something wrong, and the article fails to point that out, it is a lie of omission.