4 ms·
It may be in their interest to correct it, but it's not their obligation. Nor is it their obligation to make a web site sacred, but they did so within a day of
by extension 16y ago
It may be in their interest to correct it, but it's not their obligation. Nor is it their obligation to make a web site sacred, but they did so within a day of the public making its wishes known, and likely well before they had planned to deal with the matter. I don't know what more can reasonably be expected of them.
The press was happy to read between the lines of their initial non-committal statement but not the second one where they said "ok, you win". I guess when there's blood in the water, you can't tide the sharks over with vegetables.
- chc 16y agoThey are not obligated to correct it — but if they choose not to correct it, they do not have any right to complain about the circumstances that they were unwilling to change when it was in their power. Similarly, I am not obligated to eat well, but it is poor form for me to eat Big Macs every day and then demonize McDonalds because a diet consisting solely of their swill makes me sick.