> It's not mentioned because it's irrelevant. There is no security / performance trade off for a secure program. It's secure or its not. Everything in the worl

> It's not mentioned because it's irrelevant. There is no security / performance trade off for a secure program. It's secure or its not. Everything in the world is about trade-offs. Security is no exception. Humans figured this out a long time ago with physical security. Somehow it hasn't sunk in for cybersecurity. I would recommend mentioning this to a well-known security expert if you ever come across one and seeing their reaction.