3 ms·
There is one important network effect they seem to be neglecting - the "big ball of mud" network effect of having hundreds of Excel spreadsheets all linked into
by jl6 16y ago
There is one important network effect they seem to be neglecting - the "big ball of mud" network effect of having hundreds of Excel spreadsheets all linked into each other, forming critical parts of the finance infrastructure of megacorps. This kind of end-user-computing nightmare is so hard to migrate away from that most companies can't even conceive how to do it.
However, regulatory schemes like SOX in the USA and Solvency II and Basel III in Europe, are forcing the issue. Big banks and insurers won't be allowed to carry on running critical finance operations on such a fragile stack, so there are currently huge migrations away from Excel happening all across the financial services industry. Software like SAS and Business Objects seem to be the anti-Excels of choice.
There will obviously still be Excel on the desktop, used for ad-hoc data manipulation and visualization, which is what it is actually good for, but this type of usage is much easier to replace with something like OpenOffice.
- Tyrannosaurs 16y agoMy experience is that corporates have no great desire to migrate away from Office though. Finance users will insist (with some justification) that OO Calc isn't as good as Excel, the training department will point out reskilling costs for all the admin staff, the senior managers won't be keen to move away from PowerPoint which they all know and all of a sudden a few hundred quid a head will seem not worth saving.