3 ms·
> but malice, where homeowners are possibly price gouging the rental market for greed, is pretty much the only reason that justifies government interference. t
by zimpenfish 7y ago
> but malice, where homeowners are possibly price gouging the rental market for greed, is pretty much the only reason that justifies government interference.
to you.
> Everything else is the government imposing what one does with their private property
But they already do that with "decades old law" - e.g. you (probably) can't run a brothel from your private property in LA. Why is this such a different restriction?
- writepub 7y ago> Why is this such a different restriction I'm a little confused why this question would arise. Use of property, private or otherwise, for illegal use is, well, illegal. Your example cleanly falls under the illegal classification. I would like to note that the city council is penalizing private property owners under the assumption of malice, and not in good faith. They've unburdened themselves from proving malice, which is a sneaky encroachment of jurisdiction that they aren't entitled to.