> But overturning those contractual arrangements after the fact creates real problems. Can you expand on this a bit? Clearly there's a trade-off being made her

> But overturning those contractual arrangements after the fact creates real problems. Can you expand on this a bit? Clearly there's a trade-off being made here. There are real benefits to ensuring that ISPs actually face competition. The main argument against is around property rights, but as you stated the wires are owned by the building owner. ISPs are potentially less likely to "subsidize" infrastructure in exchange for exclusivity, but IMO that's a win. Apartment owners shouldn't be able to undermine competition in this related but separate market.