> critical of Chinese trade practices and I was surprised that he perceived the article as "anti-Chinese". For many Chinese, "learning" is semantically equal t

> critical of Chinese trade practices and I was surprised that he perceived the article as "anti-Chinese". For many Chinese, "learning" is semantically equal to "emulating". e.g. Learning to walk, learning to write, learning everything else. It's natural that the most advanced technological countries should influence the rest, like the rich is supposed to fund the poor and the strong should help the weak. And "learning" fast should be praised, like in schools. It's like a teacher shows off its skills and told students it's forbidden for follow? Tons of Chinese can not get the hang of this. One more reason many Chinese people lost hope for the US during this trade war, is because it's argued that China does not practice "rule of the law", then Rubio introduced a bill that would nullity all Huawei patents registered in the US. So for many people, the US laws are as manipulative as China's. This is explosive WTF.