3 ms·
> Try responding to the logic of my argument rather than phrase 'wealth redistribution.' When y'all land it with "Wealth redistribution doesn't work and never
by folkhack 7y ago
> Try responding to the logic of my argument rather than phrase 'wealth redistribution.'
When y'all land it with "Wealth redistribution doesn't work and never has" as the last sentence, I'm left to think that may have been your overall point!
Respectfully, I'm not going to respond to the rest of it because I do not think we would be able to effectively communicate on the topic.
- insickness 7y agoExactly. You have no response to my arguments.
- maxxxxx 7y agoYou have stated no arguments.
- folkhack 7y agoThat's the point - they won't respond to the "Western society" common sense because they'll just ignore facts and move the goalpost. Which is pretty convenient when you want to win an argument! In their eyes, they've won because I won't engage them further when in all reality no one wins because no one is willing to give up their stance. You can't nail these folks down on anything - they argue in almost pure logical fallacy, and the last thing they want is to concede to how the world _actually_ works... That's why the "fake news" thing was so incredibly damaging - if anything it signal virtues to everyone to just make up their own narrative =(