> Wouldn't it better to look at this in a more positive way: As providing the necessary (and astonishing, technologically speaking) first step in being able to

> Wouldn't it better to look at this in a more positive way: As providing the necessary (and astonishing, technologically speaking) first step in being able to treat previously untreatable conditions. There's that, but in the mean time (especially at US cost levels), the additional marginal cost added to the health care system is likely to kill a number of other people with eminently TREATABLE conditions, e.g. because they need to gamble with their insulin supplies for cost reasons.