I don't know why you are downvoted, you make very valid points. This "report" was a very weird read for me. There is a lot of vague information, it uses langu

I don't know why you are downvoted, you make very valid points. This "report" was a very weird read for me. There is a lot of vague information, it uses language like "mission critical", "high impact", .... It then mentions that the immediate driving decisions are not affected, the attack can affect high level routing decisions - like making the car turn off the highway. Then it mentions all other car manufacturers as vulnerable, and indeed conveniently mentions it's product which will protect the car. There are plenty of concerns one should have about self-driving cars, but this is blatant self-promotion and obviously a PR piece.